Aggressive
Useful for previews and less important photos. Check gradients, hair, product textures and text carefully.
Format-preserving compression
Compress WebP Online
Reduce WebP file size while keeping WebP output. This page is for a lighter version of the same format—not for converting the image to JPG, PNG or AVIF.
75–85practical photo starting range
Same.webp output extension
Comparekeep the source if it is already smaller
Compress WebP without converting
WEBP → WEBP☁
Drag and drop images here
or click to browse matching WebP files
Smart mode
Recommended default: WebP for most website images. TinySharp keeps the smaller result automatically on optimization workflows.
Estimated savings~72% smaller
Advanced quality
No files added yet.
Private browser processing. TinySharp keeps the smaller result automatically on optimization workflows.
Quality guide
Start from the image content, not a universal percentage
Quality settings behave differently on photos, screenshots and graphics. Inspect the areas users will notice first.
Balanced starting point
Often a sensible range for website photography when the goal is smaller files without obvious visual damage.
Detail-first
Better for screenshots, interface elements, close product details and assets where compression artifacts are easy to notice.
Before another compression pass
Check whether file size is really the problem
A WebP can still be heavy because its dimensions are much larger than the rendered slot. Compressing a 5000-pixel photo helps, but resizing it to the actual display width usually produces a more predictable result.
01Dimensions
Match source dimensions to the largest real display size.
02Quality
Lower quality gradually and compare important details.
03Delivery
Verify the page is serving the optimized file instead of an old cached URL.
Compression is the right task when…
- The website already accepts and serves WebP
- You only need a smaller version of the same asset
- Transparency or broad browser delivery is already working
- You want to avoid another format decision
Use a converter when…
- An app rejects WebP and requires JPG/JPEG
- You need PNG output for a transparent editing workflow
- You are testing AVIF as a separate production variant
- The final extension is part of the requirement
Make compression repeatable
Move from one WebP file to an ongoing workflow
Use the website tool for immediate files, Chrome for page audits and WordPress for automatic or bulk Media Library optimization.
Compress new uploads automatically
Optimize WordPress images, create modern variants, keep backups and verify frontend delivery.
See the WordPress optimizerFind oversized WebP files on the live page
Scan page images, check rendered dimensions and export an image audit before editing files.
Install the Chrome extensionProcess a local folder together
Queue multiple local images and download the finished batch as a ZIP.
Open bulk image workflowWebP compression FAQ
Questions about WebP-to-WebP optimization
This FAQ stays focused on compression without changing format.
Does this tool keep the WebP format?
Yes. This page is for WebP-to-WebP compression, not format conversion.
What WebP quality should I use?
For many website photos, 75 to 85 is a useful starting range. Screenshots, text and sharp UI details may need a higher setting.
Can a WebP already be fully optimized?
Yes. If the source was encoded efficiently, another pass may save very little or make quality worse. Keep the original when the output is not smaller.
Should I use WebP or AVIF instead?
Keep WebP for broad compatibility and a simple production workflow. Test AVIF when maximum compression justifies additional fallback and delivery checks.
